which resource management task deploys or activates personnel and resources?
1. Introduction
Understanding which resource management task deploys or activates personnel and resources is essential for students and professionals who want to bridge planning and execution. Resource deployment or mobilization is the phase where identified resources are transformed into active responders in the field. It involves notifying personnel, activating equipment, and ensuring Assignment authorization while maintaining Governance and Accountability. Delays or errors in deployment can reduce operational efficiency, compromise safety, and impact Delivery outcomes. This blog explores the stages, challenges, and innovations in mobilization, highlighting real-world examples, emerging technologies, and practical recommendations to ensure that resources are mobilized, acquired, and deployed efficiently and effectively.
Key Points
- Resource deployment is the task that transforms plans into action by activating personnel and equipment.
- Mobilization ensures resources are notified, assigned, and moved to the point of need efficiently.
- Proper deployment requires Assignment authorization, legal clearance, and compliance with Governance frameworks.
- Failures in deployment often stem from delayed notifications, infrastructure collapse, or licensure verification issues.
- Emerging technologies like Agentic AI, Blockchain, and MILP optimization improve speed, accountability, and efficiency.
- Polycentric governance enhances decentralization, allowing multiple decision centres to initiate mobilization
- Effective deployment activates cost centres, ensures financial control, and provides measurable Delivery outcomes.
- PMO and ERP systems help track Utilization, resource movement, and adherence to Audit requirements.
- Real-world events like the 2023 Maui Wildfires and 2024 Hurricane Helene illustrate the high stakes of mobilization.
- Combining technology, governance, and planning creates resilient, reliable, and scalable resource activation
Which Resource Management Task Deploys or Activates Personnel and Resources?
The resource management task that deploys or activates personnel and resources is resource mobilization, sometimes referred to as resource deployment [1]. This is the critical phase where planned resources become active in the field. While resource allocation and “order and acquire” set the stage, mobilization is the moment when personnel are notified, equipment is prepared, and teams physically move toward the incident site. In short, it executes the resource plan and ensures that human and material assets are ready to deliver results [2].
During mobilization, organizations also handle administrative and financial actions. Teams are given formal assignment authorization, legal approvals are verified, and cost centres are activated to track spending and ensure proper financial control. This step allows agencies to maintain Governance, Accountability, and Compliance, while simultaneously monitoring Utilization and Delivery outcomes [3]. Effective mobilization links Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management systems together, often coordinated through a PMO (Project Management Office) and supported by ERP systems for transparent tracking.
What Does Deploying or Activating Resources Mean in Resource Management?
Deploying or activating resources means moving them from a state of readiness to a state of action. Before this phase, personnel, equipment, and funding exist only as planned assets. During resource activation, teams receive official notifications, equipment is powered on, and financial mechanisms activate cost centres so operations can begin [1]. This ensures that every resource is accounted for, tracked, and legally cleared to perform its assigned tasks, maintaining Accountability and Governance throughout the process.
Modern mobilization goes beyond physical movement. It also includes digital activation of virtual support teams, verifying legal credentials for interstate operations under EMAC, and triggering financial control systems to monitor costs. Organizations mobilize resources, acquire resources, assign personnel through assignment authorization, and later release resources efficiently, making the workflow smooth and auditable [2]. By combining administrative approval with physical execution, resource deployment ensures that plans turn into real-world Delivery outcomes under structured Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management frameworks, supported by PMO (Project Management Office) oversight and integrated ERP systems [3].
Stages of Resource Management and Where Deployment Fits
Resource management follows a structured cycle that ensures resources are ready, tracked, and used efficiently. The stages are Identify Requirements, Order and Acquire, Mobilize, Track and Report, and Demobilize [1]. Among these, resource deployment or mobilization is the phase where plans become action. Before this, resources are only identified and allocated; after this, they are actively working on-site. Understanding these stages helps students and professionals see where activation fits within the full lifecycle.
Stage | Purpose | Connection to Deployment |
Identify Requirements | Determine what resources are needed | Creates the foundation for deployment |
Order and acquire | Formal requisition of resources | Mobilisation cannot start without this |
Mobilize | Activate and deploy resources | Execution phase: resources move to the field |
Track and report | Monitor resource status | Ensures accountability during deployment |
Demobilize | Return resources to home units | Closes the loop after deployment |
During mobilization, personnel are notified, equipment is activated, and logistics begin. This step allows organizations to mobilize resources, acquire resources, and ensure Assignment authorization is in place. By the end of deployment, teams are fully operational, cost centres are activated, and performance can be measured through Utilization and Delivery outcomes [2]. Properly understanding this phase ensures smooth transitions between planning and execution while maintaining Governance, Financial control, and Accountability throughout [3].
Why Resource Deployment Is a Distinct and Critical Management Task
Resource deployment is distinct because it transforms potential into action. While earlier stages like resource allocation and “order and acquire” handle planning, budgeting, and approval, deployment is the phase where resources move and start working. It bridges the gap between administrative preparation and operational reality, ensuring that personnel and equipment are ready to achieve tangible Delivery outcomes [1]. Without deployment, even the most detailed resource plans remain theoretical, failing to produce real-world impact.
This phase is also critical because it triggers key controls and oversight mechanisms. By activating personnel and equipment, organizations enforce Governance, Authorization, Financial control, and Accountability, ensuring resources are used efficiently and legally. Mobilization also aligns with Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management frameworks, integrating planning with execution. Modern disasters highlight its importance: failures in deployment, such as delayed notifications during the 2023 Maui Wildfires, directly contributed to response inefficiency and loss of life [2]. Proper deployment ensures that resources are mobilized, acquired, tracked via ERP systems, and later released smoothly, making it a central pillar of effective emergency and enterprise resource management [3].
Operational Challenges and Friction Points in Resource Deployment
Even with clear plans, resource deployment often faces operational friction. One common problem is the “self-dispatch” paradox, where personnel or organizations move to a disaster site without official orders. While well-intentioned, these resources bypass the Identify Requirements and Order and Acquire phases, creating an Accountability gap. Incident Commanders cannot track unknown personnel, which complicates logistics, food, shelter, and fuel distribution. This was a major issue during Hurricane Katrina and remains a recurring challenge in modern disaster response [1].
Legal and logistical barriers also slow deployment. For example, mobilizing medical teams across state lines requires license verification under EMAC. Delays in validating credentials, uncertainty around liability, and differences in scope of practice can prevent rapid resource activation. Physical infrastructure failures, such as damaged roads or communication systems, further hinder the movement of personnel and equipment. During the 2024 Hurricane Helene response, centralized platforms like WebEOC were unusable due to network collapse, forcing local teams to improvise decentralized mobilization. These operational challenges highlight why deploying resources is not just administrative—it is a complex, high-stakes task requiring Governance, Risk management, and technological support like ERP systems for Track and Report [2][3].
Legal and Credentialing Barriers in Resource Mobilization
Mobilizing specialized personnel across state lines requires careful legal compliance. Under the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC), licenses from a responder’s home state are generally valid in the requesting state, but verification delays often slow activation [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic and recent hurricane seasons, healthcare providers experienced significant delays because their credentials had to be manually confirmed before deployment. These bottlenecks highlight how legal frameworks, while protective, can slow the execution of resource mobilization.
Liability and scope of practice also affect deployment decisions. Surveys show that nearly 60% of clinicians consider malpractice coverage a critical factor in deciding whether to mobilize. EMAC provides tort liability protection, yet uncertainties about tasks not explicitly covered by a home-state license can create hesitation. For instance, a nurse practitioner authorized to prescribe in one state may face restrictions when deployed elsewhere, delaying resource activation [2]. Effective deployment, therefore, requires careful integration of Governance, Authorization, and Accountability, ensuring personnel are legally cleared, properly assigned, and tracked in ERP systems for operational and financial transparency [3].
Case Studies: Maui Wildfires (2023) and Hurricane Helene (2024)
Real-world disasters reveal the strengths and weaknesses of resource deployment. In the 2023 Maui Wildfires, the failure was primarily in the notification phase. The all-hazard siren system and opt-in text alerts did not activate in time, preventing responders and the public from mobilizing before the firestorm reached Lahaina [1]. Even though personnel and equipment were available, the delay in resource activation created a critical Accountability gap. Geography further complicated mobilization—air and sea transport were required, slowing the arrival of mutual aid and illustrating the need for pre-staged, rapid-deployment protocols.
In contrast, the 2024 Hurricane Helene response involved large-scale pre-staged mobilization, but last-mile logistics caused friction. Centralized platforms like WebEOC failed when communication infrastructure collapsed, forcing local units to improvise and implement decentralized methods [2]. Supply chains were overwhelmed, leading to “phantom resources” that appeared in tracking systems but never arrived. These cases demonstrate that successful resource deployment depends not only on planning and allocation but also on robust notification, infrastructure resilience, and the ability to mobilize resources efficiently under Governance and Risk management frameworks [3].
Comparative Analysis of Mobilization Failures
Failure Dimension | Maui Wildfires (2023) | Hurricane Helene (2024) |
Primary Failure | Notification triggers failed | Logistics overload; central comms failure |
Mobilization Type | Rapid onset / no notice | Notice event; pre-staged mobilization |
Constraint | Island geography; limited mutual aid | Infrastructure collapse; FEMA workforce exhaustion |
Key Lesson | Multi-channel activation needed | Decentralized logistics authority is critical |
Emerging Technologies in Resource Mobilization
Modern resource deployment is increasingly supported by advanced technologies to overcome delays, friction, and human limitations. Three key innovations are Agentic AI, Blockchain (Eghatha model), and Mathematical Optimization (MILP) [4]. These tools enhance speed, transparency, and efficiency in activating personnel, equipment, and funding.
Agentic AI allows autonomous drafting of resource orders. Instead of waiting for human approval, AI systems analyse hazard data and recommend specific resource activation actions, reducing decision latency. For example, the Climate RADAR system uses real-time hazard data to direct volunteers and responders precisely where they are needed, optimizing resource mobilization while maintaining Governance and Accountability [5].
Blockchain technology, exemplified by the Eghatha system, provides secure tracking of resources. Smart contracts record when assets are mobilized, acquired, or released, creating an immutable audit trail that ensures Compliance, reduces fraud, and improves trust among agencies [6].
Mathematical Optimization, particularly Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) models, helps decision-makers plan resource movement efficiently. These models balance cost, speed, and availability, ensuring that personnel and equipment are deployed from optimal locations rather than simply the nearest [7].
Emerging Technologies in Resource Mobilization
Technology | Application | Benefits |
Agentic AI | Autonomous resource order drafting, real-time hazard response | Reduces decision delays, proactive activation |
Blockchain (Eghatha) | Secure resource tracking, smart contracts | Fraud prevention, multi-agency trust, auditability |
MILP / Genetic Algorithms | Optimized transport and allocation | Balances speed vs cost, maximizes efficiency |
By combining AI, blockchain, and optimization algorithms, emergency managers can accelerate resource activation, ensure Assignment authorization, and track Utilization and Delivery outcomes efficiently across Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management systems [8].
Future Governance and Policy Recommendations for Efficient Mobilization
The evolution of resource deployment is not solely technological; governance structures must also adapt. Traditional hierarchical systems can delay resource activation during complex emergencies, whereas polycentric governance allows multiple, overlapping decision centres to act independently but in coordination [4]. For example, a local fire chief, a private utility operator, and an NGO leader can all initiate mobilization within their domains, reducing delays caused by central bottlenecks. This approach enhances Governance, Accountability, and Risk management while ensuring that decentralized action still aligns with overall objectives.
Digital integration is equally critical. Digital-by-default governance embeds interoperability and secure data exchange into mobilization systems. AI agents can request, track, and deploy resources across jurisdictions without manual re-entry, ensuring that cost centres are activated, and financial control is maintained in real time [5]. Moreover, FEMA’s role must evolve federal agencies and private-sector partners should be able to mobilize their own resources within standardized frameworks, ensuring that emergency response does not stall due to central agency overload [6].
Recommendations for effective future mobilization:
- Polycentric Decision-Making: Delegate authority to local units with pre-authorized triggers.
- Digital Integration: Use secure, interoperable databases for resource tracking.
- Private Sector Inclusion: Incorporate utilities, supply chains, and NGOs into planning.
- Training and Standardization: Ensure all agencies understand NIMS protocols.
- Redundancy as Resilience: Multiple activation points prevent single-point failures.
By implementing these measures, resource deployment becomes faster, more reliable, and auditable. Organizations can mobilize resources, maintain Assignment authorization, track Utilization, and achieve measurable Delivery outcomes across Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management systems [7][8].
Mobilization as the Critical Resource Management Task
Mobilization is the pivotal task that deploys or activates personnel and resources. It is the moment when plans, approvals, and allocations become tangible action. Without effective mobilization, even the best-laid resource plans fail to achieve real-world Delivery outcomes [1]. By notifying personnel, activating equipment, verifying credentials, and triggering cost centres, mobilization ensures that resources are ready, accountable, and legally compliant.
The challenges faced in disasters such as the 2023 Maui Wildfires and 2024 Hurricane Helene highlight the complexity of this task. Failures often stem from upstream issues like notification delays, legal bottlenecks, or infrastructure collapse [2][3]. The future of effective resource deployment lies in combining technological solutions—like Agentic AI for proactive decision-making, Blockchain for secure tracking, and MILP for optimized logistics—with polycentric governance models that allow decentralized, resilient action [4][5].
By integrating these strategies, emergency management can bridge the gap between theoretical plans and operational reality. Organizations can efficiently mobilize resources, ensure Assignment authorization, track Utilization, maintain Accountability, and achieve measurable Delivery outcomes while staying compliant with Governance, Financial control, and Audit standards [6][7][8]. Ultimately, mobilization is not just a task—it is the engine that powers effective disaster response and resource management.
How Does Resource Deployment Differ from Resource Planning?
Resource deployment executes plans, while resource planning identifies needs, allocates assets, and develops schedules. Deployment turns administrative approvals into action, ensuring personnel and equipment are activated, assigned, and mobilized resources effectively [4].
Deployment is the kinetic phase of the resource management lifecycle. Planning alone does not trigger Assignment authorization or activate cost centres; mobilization ensures operational readiness and measurable Delivery outcomes.
What Role Does the PMO Play in Resource Deployment?
The PMO coordinates resource activation, monitors compliance, and ensures that Project Management, Program Management, and Portfolio Management frameworks are integrated. It also tracks Utilization and enforces Governance, ensuring teams execute resource plans efficiently [5].
Through centralized reporting and workflow oversight, the PMO ensures resources are mobilized, acquired, and later released smoothly, providing transparency across ERP systems and facilitating financial control.
How Do Tools and Technology Support Resource Mobilization?
Tools like ERP systems, blockchain platforms (Eghatha), and AI-based predictive models streamline resource deployment. They automate notifications, track personnel, and validate credentials, ensuring assets are mobilized and accounted for in real time [6].
These tools enhance Accountability, reduce human error, and optimize logistics. By integrating technology, organizations can execute resource plans, monitor cost centres, and maintain robust Audit trails for compliance.
What Are the Risks of Poorly Controlled Resource Deployment?
Ineffective deployment can lead to wasted resources, delayed response, legal liabilities, and operational chaos. Risks include untracked personnel, infrastructure overload, and failure to activate cost centres, undermining financial control and Governance [7].
Historical cases like Maui Wildfires and Hurricane Helene demonstrate how mismanaged mobilization can create bottlenecks, duplicate effort, and reduce Delivery outcomes despite available resources.
How Does Resource Deployment Impact Financial and Operational Accountability?
Deployment activates cost centres, enabling accurate tracking of spending and resource utilization. Proper oversight ensures Governance, Financial control, and Audit readiness, connecting operational execution to organizational accountability [8].
By enforcing Assignment authorization and tracking deployed assets in ERP systems, organizations can measure efficiency, report on Utilization, and improve future mobilization strategies.
Can Agile Environments Use Formal Resource Deployment?
Yes. Agile frameworks adapt resource deployment through iterative, flexible mobilization cycles. Teams can quickly mobilize resources, adjust assignments, and optimize Delivery outcomes without waiting for traditional hierarchical approvals [4].
Agile deployment emphasizes decentralization, polycentric governance, and rapid response, enabling faster action while still maintaining Governance, Accountability, and proper Assignment authorization.
Conclusion
In today’s fast-paced emergency and enterprise environments, resource deployment is the critical task that turns planning into tangible action. By mobilizing personnel, activating equipment, and ensuring Assignment authorization, organizations can achieve real-world Delivery outcomes. The challenges of modern mobilization—delayed notifications, infrastructure failure, and legal bottlenecks—highlight the need for careful integration of Governance, Financial control, and Accountability into the deployment process.
Technological innovations like Agentic AI allow proactive decision-making, while Blockchain (Eghatha) ensures secure tracking of resources. Mathematical optimization models (MILP) further improve efficiency, balancing speed and cost to deploy the right resources at the right time. Polycentric governance complements these tools by empowering local decision centres, ensuring decentralized but coordinated action, even when central systems fail.
For students and future professionals in emergency management or business operations, understanding the deployment phase is essential. It bridges theory and practice, connecting planning with execution while safeguarding compliance and operational efficiency.
FAQs
1.What is the resource management task that deploys or activates personnel?
It is resource deployment, also called mobilization, where personnel and equipment are activated and moved to the point of need.
2.How does resource deployment differ from resource planning?
Planning identifies needs, allocation, and schedules, while deployment executes these plans, ensuring Assignment authorization and resource activation.
3.Why is mobilization important in emergency management?
Mobilization ensures personnel and equipment are ready to respond, achieving real-world Delivery outcomes and maintaining Accountability.
4.What are common challenges in resource deployment?
Delays in notifications, licensure verification, infrastructure failures, and self-dispatch of personnel can impede effective mobilization.
5.Can technology improve resource deployment?
Yes. Agentic AI, Blockchain, and MILP optimization reduce delays, ensure transparency, and enhance Governance.
6.Who authorizes resource deployment?
Deployment requires Assignment authorization by authorized officials, such as Incident Commanders, PMOs, or local decision centres.
7.What role do PMOs play in mobilization?
PMOs coordinate resource activation, track Utilization, enforce Governance, and ensure compliance with Project Management frameworks.
8.How does resource deployment impact financial control?
Activation of cost centres allows tracking of expenses, supporting financial control, Audit, and accountability.
9.Are resource deployment relevant outside emergencies?
Yes. Enterprises, corporations, and NGOs use deployment to mobilize teams, equipment, and digital resources efficiently.
10.What is the difference between activation and deployment?
Activation is the administrative green light, while deployment is the physical or digital movement of resources.
11.Can Agile teams use formal resource deployment?
Yes. Agile approaches adapt mobilization through iterative and decentralized activation cycles.
12.What is Mission Ready Packages (MRPs)?
MRPs bundle personnel, equipment, and costs to accelerate deployment and simplify resource activation.
13.How does polycentric governance improve mobilization?
It allows multiple decision centres to act independently yet coordinate efficiently, reducing bottlenecks.
14.What is self-dispatching, and why is it risky?
Self-dispatching occurs when personnel arrive without orders, creating accountability gaps and logistical burdens.
15.Which tools track deployed resources?
ERP systems, blockchain platforms, and AI-based dashboards help monitor Utilization, Delivery outcomes, and compliance.
We’d love your feedback! Did this guide help you understand which resource management task deploys or activates personnel and resources? Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell us how you might apply these principles in your studies or projects. If you found this article useful, share it with friends or classmates—your peers might also benefit from learning about resource deployment and effective mobilization strategies.
sources
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) – NHS England, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/prevention/antimicrobial-resistance-amr/
- Antimicrobial Resistance trends in England, 2019 to 2024: ESPAUR Report 2024-25 – PMC, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12779621/
- English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2024 to 2025 – GOV.UK, accessed February 8, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6936ac34b612700b2cb73607/ESPAUR-report-2024-to-2025.pdf
- Nearly 400 antibiotic-resistant infections each week in 2024 – GOV.UK, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nearly-400-antibiotic-resistant-infections-each-week-in-2024
- English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2023 to 2024 – UK Parliament, accessed February 8, 2026, https://qna.files.parliament.uk/qna-attachments/1799211/original/ESPAUR%20report%202023%20to%202024-compressed.pdf
- Disparities in infection, antimicrobial resistance and consumption rates: Findings from national reporting in England 2018-2023, accessed February 8, 2026, https://bsac.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/29-Diane-Ashiru-Oredope.pdf
- UK 2024 to 2029 antimicrobial resistance national action plan: 1-year progress report, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-5-year-action-plan-for-amr-1-year-progress-report/uk-2024-to-2029-antimicrobial-resistance-national-action-plan-1-year-progress-report
- Antimicrobial resistance: addressing the risks – Parliament UK, accessed February 8, 2026, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmpubacc/646/report.html
- Confronting antimicrobial resistance 2024 to 2029 – GOV.UK, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-5-year-action-plan-for-antimicrobial-resistance-2024-to-2029/confronting-antimicrobial-resistance-2024-to-2029
- Oral versus intravenous antibiotics: Oral antibiotics are more cost-effective and may be safer than intravenous antibiotics for most infections in stable adults – PMC, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12817030/
- (PDF) Continued Intravenous Versus First Week Transition to Oral Antibiotic Therapy in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – ResearchGate, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382542140_Continued_Intravenous_Versus_First_Week_Transition_to_Oral_Antibiotic_Therapy_in_Bloodstream_Infections_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis
- Efficacy and safety of earlier switching to an oral antibiotic therapy …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40660856/
- Effectiveness, cost effectiveness and experiences of switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics in neonates with probable ea – medRxiv, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.20.25338361v1.full.pdf
- P35 Impact of IV to oral antibiotic switch optimization on nurse time …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/jacamr/article/6/Supplement_2/dlae136.039/7738651
- UK Publishes 1-Year Progress Report on Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plan, accessed February 8, 2026, https://healthindustryleaders.com/uk-publishes-1-year-progress-report-on-antimicrobial-resistance-national-action-plan/
- Drugs used in hospitals leave giant carbon footprint – AAMC, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.aamc.org/news/drugs-used-hospitals-leave-giant-carbon-footprint
- National medicines optimisation opportunities 2024/25 – NHS England, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/national-medicines-optimisation-opportunities-2023-24/
- Criteria to achieve safe antimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch in hospitalised adult populations: a systematic rapid review | BMJ Open, accessed February 8, 2026, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e068299
- National antimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch (IVOS) criteria for prompt switch for adults, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/antimicrobial-intravenous-to-oral-switch-criteria-for-early-switch/national-antimicrobial-intravenous-to-oral-switch-ivos-criteria-for-early-switch
- The national Intravenous to Oral Antibiotic Switch (IVOS) Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) scheme; exploration, accessed February 8, 2026, https://bsac.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/33.pdf
- P16 The national IV to Oral Antibiotic Switch (IVOS) Commissioning …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12674761/
- A qualitative interview study applying the COM-B model to explore how hospital-based trainers implement antimicrobial stewardship education and training in UK hospital-based care – UKHSA Research Portal, accessed February 8, 2026, https://researchportal.ukhsa.gov.uk/en/publications/a-qualitative-interview-study-applying-the-com-b-model-to-explore/
- (PDF) Nurses’ perceptions of their role in antimicrobial stewardship within the hospital environment. An integrative literature review – ResearchGate, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358208471_Nurses’_perceptions_of_their_role_in_antimicrobial_stewardship_within_the_hospital_environment_An_integrative_literature_review
- Antimicrobial ethicists: Making ethics explicit in antimicrobial …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9495412/
- A qualitative interview study applying the COM-B model to explore …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357727/
- Barriers and facilitators of the implementation for the antimicrobial Social Norm Feedback (SNF) intervention strategy in primary care institutions – PMC, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12421760/
- systematic review of national interventions and policies to optimize …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/79/6/1234/7632540
- Ensuring Safer Hospitals: Strategies For Effective Infection Control – The Review of Diabetic Studies, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.diabeticstudies.org/index.php/RDS/article/view/1378/1217
- Switching patients from IV to oral antimicrobials – The Pharmaceutical Journal, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/ld/switching-patients-from-iv-to-oral-antimicrobials
- Patient-reported Perceptions, Experiences, and Preferences Around Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for the Treatment of Staphylo – Minerva Access, accessed February 8, 2026, https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstreams/3aaa182e-4488-450b-85fe-9fa213f307ee/download
- Patient and clinician views on inpatient antibiotic shared decision-making: a qualitative study – PMC, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12775835/
Effectiveness of sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection: the SEQUENCE cohort study – PubMed, accessed February 8, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27180242/
About Us
At Get90Plus, we believe that students shouldn’t have to choose between their mental health and their GPA. We were founded on a simple but powerful promise: to provide assignment help that guarantees 90+ grades, or you don’t pay.
We understand that modern students aren’t just “lazy”—they are overwhelmed. Between balancing part-time jobs, navigating complex subjects, and managing strict deadlines, the pressure can be suffocating. Get90Plus exists to relieve that pressure. We are not a content mill or a team of faceless freelancers; we are a dedicated collective of over 500 subject-matter experts, PhD scholars, and former educators committed to your academic success.
Our Mission To empower students by delivering high-quality, scientifically accurate, and academically rigorous assignments that secure top grades. We aim to be the partner you trust when the coursework becomes unmanageable, allowing you to focus on learning without the burnout.
What Sets Us Apart
- The 90+ Guarantee: We are so confident in our experts that we back every assignment with a money-back guarantee if we don’t meet our grade promise.
- Zero AI, 100% Human: In an era of automated content, we stand firm on academic integrity. Every paper is written from scratch by a qualified human expert—no ChatGPT, no spinners, just original critical thinking.
- Subject Mastery: From STEM fields like Engineering and Data Science to the Humanities, Law, and Nursing, our team covers over 100+ subjects with specialised knowledge.
- Confidentiality & Trust: We prioritise your privacy and offer unlimited revisions to ensure the final product meets your exact institutional standards.
Whether you are struggling with a first-year essay or a final-year dissertation, Get90Plus is here to ensure you don’t just meet the deadline—you crush it.